When done well, with follow-up to ensure that the actions desired
of listeners are under way or completed, communication with employees and
colleagues have power to build trust. Leaders inform, inspire, and can even
improve performance when trust is nurtured.
Leaders who score high on both trust and communication
skills ranked in the top quartile for employee engagement, according to
research among 400,000 employees who reported to 75,000 leaders [i].
This research also showed that leaders who scored high in trust but low in
communication skills ranked in the 45th percentile on engagement
and leaders who scored high in communication skills but low in trust ranked in
the 52nd percentile on employee engagement. It’s evident that, when
it comes to employee engagement, which is a strongly correlated with
organizational performance, it is not enough for leaders just to be trusted or
simply to be strong communicators if they want to have a measurable impact on
performance.
All communication, however, contains risk. As much as strong
communication skills can build trust, poor communication can undermine trust.
In business, what matters is to produce results.
Business professionals must be
very good –– not just competent –– at designing, preparing, managing, and closing
effective communications that generate the right actions by employees.
Leaders spend most of their communication in one of four
activities with employees and colleagues: managing relationships, acting on
past promises or commitments, directing teams how to execute strategy, or
supporting team members in dealing with others (customers, vendors,
colleagues).
Leaders who possess strong communication skills commit
themselves to action when they speak. These commitments can take the form of
requests, promises, offers, declarations, assessments (interpretations), or
assertions (statements of fact). A seventh action, and the one that obviously creates
distrust, is obfuscation – lies, half-truths, distractions, excuses, and the
like.
Commitments can take one of two forms: tactical (following
up on requests and promises by coordinating resources and activities to produce
specific results) or existential (responding to moods and emotions by
communicating and motivating people the strive for greatness).
The strongest communicators solicit and listen to and act
on feedback and concerns from their teams and colleagues. They reflect on those
concerns by examining their own. They commit themselves and their time to help
others resolve those concerns, some of which may interfere with their ability
to do their jobs. This produces or enhances trust.
Distrust that emerges because of poor communication
practices in an organization can be the consequence of one of several missteps
in communication:
Commitments fundamentally create a partnership where all the
partners agree to bring about some mutually beneficial new future. That
commitment may be existential such as to quality of care for patients in a
hospital or it may be more mundane such as to agree to daily check-ins on
progress toward a team goal.
Distrust happens because a
blindness to how existing communication practices or habits is failing to
produce behaviors.
Trust can be rebuilt by paying attention to how leaders communicate.
In every interaction, every promise, every moment to build something with
someone, leaders can be producing uncertainty for the listener or reducing it.
Simple examination of communication patterns and practices
can pinpoint whether listeners are misperceiving the message because of their
previous experience with leaders who failed to fulfill commitments, failed to
clearly explain their expectations, or perhaps used imprecise language in their
communication.
Leaders have a responsibility to observe unspoken moods,
moments of distrust, and to see them as demands for examining their communication
skills. Ask colleagues for honest assessments of their communications. Query
employees on what they heard and compare their responses to what the leader has
said or written. Leverage the communication skills and capacities of others in
their network to improve the relationship with listeners.
This kind of deep self-observation takes time and also takes
commitment. By cultivating new skills and persevering at improving them,
leaders can learn how to make achievable commitments. This does not mean
lowering the bar to action; it means configuring the plan to fulfill
commitments before making the promises in the first place. That, too, requires
reflection and practice.
[i] “Understanding Trust: The Salt of Leadership,” Joseph Folkman, Forbes, July 28, 2020
Learn more about how we can help you.
contact usIf you are a client and have been provided with
login information, login in below:
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.